top of page

2026 LSETAC AGM Judging Form

Select the most appropriate level for each section on a scale of 1 (clearly deficient) to 5 (superb). Remember, a score of 5 should be reserved for exceptional presentations.


View the detailed rubrics here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qwn3jfvpI_BME01ny9Pa38JqCA7ugnV8n3azEq2xHaI/edit?usp=sharing

Indicate presentation format
Background/Hypothesis: Evaluate the clarity and relevance of the background information, connections to literature, and the articulation of goals and hypotheses.
1
2
3
4
5
Experimental Logic: Assess the appropriateness and clarity of the experimental methods, including descriptions of controls and comparative groups.
1
2
3
4
5
Results: Judge the quality, clarity, and logical presentation of the data, as well as the identification of potential problems or alternative approaches.
1
2
3
4
5
Conclusion: Determine how well the conclusions are supported by the data and their relevance to the broader context.
1
2
3
4
5
Figures and Tables: Rate how well-labeled and clearly explained the figures and tables are, ensuring they enhance data understanding and balance well with the text.
1
2
3
4
5
Logical and clear presentation: Evaluate the overall clarity, logical progression, simplicity, text quality, visual elements, and media use of the presentation to enhance audience understanding and engagement.
1
2
3
4
5
bottom of page